News From Us

Occupational illness is one of the slowest-moving but most costly risks in mining. Under the Mine Health and Safety Act, managing it is not optional: the environmental engineering and occupational hygiene regulations require employers to keep workers’ exposure to airborne pollutants, noise and heat below defined limits — and to prove it. Increasingly, that means moving from periodic sampling to real-time occupational hygiene monitoring.

This guide explains what the regulations expect, why a few spot measurements are no longer enough, and what a credible monitoring approach looks like.

What the occupational hygiene regulations expect

Under the MHSA’s mine environmental engineering and occupational hygiene regulations (Chapter 9) and the related schedules, employers must, in summary:

• Ensure that employees’ occupational exposure to health hazards is kept below the limits set out in the regulations (the occupational exposure limits, referenced in Schedule 22.9).
• Establish and maintain a system of occupational hygiene measurements across the working places where those hazards occur.
• Assess and manage exposure to airborne pollutants — including dust, diesel particulate matter (DPM) and hazardous gases — as well as noise and heat (thermal stress).
• Report into the broader framework of the South African Mines Occupational Hygiene Programme (SAMOHP).
• Have procedures to respond promptly when limits are approached or exceeded.

This is a plain-language summary. Operators should work from the regulations, the SAMOHP codebook and their own risk assessment to confirm their specific obligations and limits.

Why periodic sampling is no longer enough

Traditional occupational hygiene relies on periodic surveys: a hygienist visits, takes samples, and a report follows weeks later. That approach has structural weaknesses:

• It misses peaks. Exposure is rarely constant. A periodic sample can completely miss the short, intense spikes — a blocked ventilation run, a DPM build-up, a dusty re-entry — that drive real health risk.
• It reacts slowly. If a result only arrives weeks later, workers have already been exposed and no timely action was possible.
• It is hard to prove continuously. Demonstrating that exposure stayed below the limit across a shift and across working places is difficult with occasional snapshots.
• It does not trigger response. The regulations expect prompt action when limits are approached — which requires knowing in near real time, not after the fact.

Why the compliance bar is higher than it looks

“Real-time monitoring” is easy to claim and hard to deliver as a compliant system. The demanding parts are usually:

• Multiple hazards, not one. Dust, DPM, gases (such as CO, NO₂ and others), noise and heat are different measurements. A single-parameter instrument covers only a slice of the obligation.
• Multiple working places. Exposure must be managed where the work happens — across many faces, headings and changing locations — not just at one fixed point.
• Data logging and records. Compliance has to be demonstrable, which means continuous, time-stamped records that can be summarised for reporting.
• Alerting and response. The data has to drive prompt action, so threshold alerts need to reach the right people in time.
• Certification and ruggedness underground. Instruments in hazardous atmospheres typically need recognised explosion-protection certification, and must survive dust, water and vibration.

The practical takeaway: compliance is about a connected monitoring system — multi-hazard, multi-location, logged, alerting and maintained — not a single handheld meter.

A procurement checklist for occupational hygiene monitoring

1. Does it cover the relevant hazards for your operation — dust, DPM, gases, noise and heat?
2. Can it monitor across your actual working places, including changing locations?
3. Does it provide continuous, time-stamped logging suitable for SAMOHP reporting?
4. Does it raise threshold alerts in time to act before limits are exceeded?
5. Is the hardware certified and rugged for your underground environment?
6. Is there a calibration, testing and maintenance regime with records?

How addanode approaches occupational hygiene monitoring

addanode helps mines move from periodic snapshots to a connected, real-time view of exposure — combining the right sensing for dust, gas, DPM, noise and heat with logging, alerting and reporting that supports occupational hygiene obligations. Our focus is the whole system: coverage across working places, retained records for demonstration, and alerts that drive the prompt response the regulations expect. You can read more about our asset and condition monitoring and mining IoT work, or talk to us about your exposure-monitoring obligations.

Frequently asked questions

What does the MHSA require for occupational hygiene?
Employers must keep workers’ exposure to airborne pollutants, noise and heat below the prescribed occupational exposure limits, maintain a system of occupational hygiene measurements across working places, report within the SAMOHP framework, and respond promptly when limits are approached.

Is periodic sampling still acceptable?
Periodic surveys remain part of occupational hygiene practice, but they miss exposure peaks and react slowly. Real-time monitoring complements them by providing continuous visibility, early alerts and the records needed to demonstrate compliance.

What should a real-time monitoring system cover?
For most mines, the relevant hazards include dust, diesel particulate matter, hazardous gases, noise and thermal stress — measured across the working places where exposure occurs, with logging and alerting.

Talk to addanode about occupational hygiene monitoring

Demonstrating that exposure stays below the limit — continuously, across every working place — takes a connected system, not occasional readings. To discuss an approach for your operation, contact the addanode team.

---

This article is part of addanode’s South African compliance series. See also: MHSA 16.7 and missing person locator systems, MHSA 8.10.1 and TMM collision prevention, and effluent monitoring and DWS compliance.